|
Send this Runner's Web Story's URL to a friend. Visit the FrontPage for the latest news.   |     View in Runner's Web Frame |
|
| ||||
|
Posted: August 3, 2005 Athletics: No-False Start Rule Proposal Withdrawn By Bob Ramsak, Track Profile © 2005 Track Profile all rights reserved TrackProfile.com HELSINKI, Finland -- Following considerable opposition and concern voiced by delegates, the IAAF Council withdrew its proposal of adopting a strict no-false start rule in the sprint events. The proposal, set forth by Council at its meeting in Doha in April, would have called for immediate disqualification after a single false start. Pending further discussion and research, the rule currently in place, in which a first false start is charged to the field and the second results in disqualification, will remain in use. Many delegates sided with the view of the IAAF Technical Commission, which disagreed with the Council’s original proposal. “At the moment, the technology is such that all equipment is not the same,” said David Littlewood of Great Britain, adding that he’d be more in favor of the proposal if there existed a “certainty that every system would produce the same results.” An IAAF survey of sprinters last year illustrated a clear divide in opinion, while an informal poll on its website showed considerable opposition to the rule change. A survey last May of top international sprinters and hurdlers by The Track Profile Report [see TPR #263] also showed a hefty amount of opposition to the proposed rule change. Bill Roe, the president of USA Track & Field, voiced his federation’s concern, despite the existence of the no-false start rule that is used at the NCAA level in the United States. With different equipment being used around the world, while simply not existing in some areas, Roe said that “Success of the rule largely depends on the quality of the starters.” Theophile Montcho of Benin agreed with Roe’s sentiments. “We don’t have these kids of devices in our country. When our athletes participate in international events for the first time, it becomes very unfair.” Jamaican Howard Aris also agreed. “There is too much uncertainty. We need more time.” Olympian Frank Fredericks of Namibia, a member of the Athletes Commission, said he was disappointed with the withdrawal of the proposal, but added that he understood why the decision was reached. “There is a certain amount of gamesmanship in the sprints,” he said. “And not allowing any false starts eliminates that. But I can understand where Congress is coming from. If you look in terms of the jumps and throws, where at least three attempts are allowed, having only one in the sprints doesn’t seem fair.” IAAF president Lamine Diack said the matter will be investigated further, and may be revisited at the next Congress in 2007. Copyright © Bob Ramsak and Track Profile. All rights reserved TrackProfile.com © 1996 - 2005 RunnersWeb.com - All rights reserved.
|
| |||
|
Runner's Web FrontPage | ||||