Posted: September 8, 2005
Science of Sport: Carbohydrate mouthwash is ergogenic
Supplementary carbohydrate does not have to be swallowed or
infused in order to exert an ergogenic effect. A remarkable new UK
study has found that a carbohydrate mouthwash, rinsed around the
mouth at regular intervals during a one-hour cycling time trial,
led to a significant improvement in power output and performance
time.
Carbohydrate (CHO) ingestion immediately before and during
exercise of a relatively short and intense nature has been shown to
boost performance in previous research, with no obvious metabolic
explanation for this effect.
The team responsible for the current study got the idea of
studying carbs in mouthwash form from their own observation that a
glucose infusion (as opposed to oral administration) had no
beneficial effect on performance in a simulated 40k time trial.
‘These results suggest,’ they explain, ‘that oral
CHO may exert its effects during high-intensity exercise through a
central action, improving motor drive or motivation, mediated by
receptors in the mouth or GI tract.’
The aim of the study was to investigate the possible role of
carbohydrate receptors in the mouth in influencing exercise
performance. The use of a mouth rinse treatment, which was spat out
without being swallowed, removed any influence of the gut and CHO
oxidation on performance.
Seven male and two female endurance cyclists completed two
performance trials, in which they had to accomplish a set amount of
work as quickly as possible. On one occasion, a 6.4% maltodextrin
solution (CHO) was rinsed around the mouth for every 12.5% of the
trial completed, and on the other a placebo liquid (water) was used
in the same way.
The results were quite clear:
- Performance time was significantly faster in the CHO trial
compared with placebo – an average of 59.57 minutes compared
with 61.37 minutes, representing a 2.9% improvement;
- Power output with CHO was correspondingly higher, at 259W
compared with 252W for placebo;
- There were no differences in heart rate or rating of perceived
exertion between the two trials.
‘To our knowledge,’ say the researchers, ‘this
is the first study that has investigated the role of the mouth as a
factor in CHO supplementation during high-intensity exercise
performance.’
How can the effects be explained? The fact that the solution was
spat out and not swallowed makes it unlikely that the performance
improvements were related to metabolic action of the CHO, as
minimal quantities of the maltodextrin would have entered the
gut.
The researchers speculate that triggering of receptors within
the oral cavity by the CHO could have resulted in the stimulation
of the reward and/or pleasure centres in the brain, leading to
enhanced motivation. Such responses are known with other
substances, such as chocolate.
Meanwhile, they conclude that ‘the existence of such CHO
receptors in the mouth and their effect on performance warrants
further investigation. These additional studies should involve a
variety of rinse formulations and should rule out the possibility
of potential placebo effects.’
Med Sci Sports Exerc, vol 36, no 12, 2107- 2111,
2004
|